<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the NSA revelations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hlswatch.com/2005/12/19/thoughts-on-the-nsa-revelations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hlswatch.com/2005/12/19/thoughts-on-the-nsa-revelations/</link>
	<description>News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:03:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Government Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Secret Program to Combat terrorist financing</title>
		<link>http://www.hlswatch.com/2005/12/19/thoughts-on-the-nsa-revelations/comment-page-1/#comment-5120</link>
		<dc:creator>Government Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Secret Program to Combat terrorist financing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 16:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hlswatch.com/?p=89#comment-5120</guid>
		<description>[...] Iâ€™ve been critical of the NSA program that was revealed by the same New York Times reporters in December. But I think this program is very different, and plays a valid and important role in the war on terrorism, for three reasons: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Iâ€™ve been critical of the NSA program that was revealed by the same New York Times reporters in December. But I think this program is very different, and plays a valid and important role in the war on terrorism, for three reasons: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homeland Security Watch &#187; NYT reveals secret program to combat terrorist financing</title>
		<link>http://www.hlswatch.com/2005/12/19/thoughts-on-the-nsa-revelations/comment-page-1/#comment-4826</link>
		<dc:creator>Homeland Security Watch &#187; NYT reveals secret program to combat terrorist financing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 04:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hlswatch.com/?p=89#comment-4826</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve been critical of the NSA program that was revealed by the same New York Times reporters in December. But I think this program is very different, and plays a valid and important role in the war on terrorism, for three reasons: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve been critical of the NSA program that was revealed by the same New York Times reporters in December. But I think this program is very different, and plays a valid and important role in the war on terrorism, for three reasons: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homeland Security Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The NSA goes to Silicon Valley</title>
		<link>http://www.hlswatch.com/2005/12/19/thoughts-on-the-nsa-revelations/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Homeland Security Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The NSA goes to Silicon Valley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 04:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hlswatch.com/?p=89#comment-306</guid>
		<description>[...] Most of the blog reaction to this story has been critical, wondering why tech companies would get involved with the NSA. I&#8217;ve expressed concerns in the last two months about the apparent circumvention of U.S. law in the recent NSA revelations, but this seems like exactly what the NSA should be doing: seeking out new ideas from the nation&#8217;s brightest technology minds. The NSA absolutely needs to stay ahead of the technology curve and adopt leading-edge tools. That&#8217;s not inconsistent with wanting there to be a better framework to ensure that the applications of these technologies are legal and are used consistent with the nation&#8217;s system of checks and balances. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Most of the blog reaction to this story has been critical, wondering why tech companies would get involved with the NSA. I&#8217;ve expressed concerns in the last two months about the apparent circumvention of U.S. law in the recent NSA revelations, but this seems like exactly what the NSA should be doing: seeking out new ideas from the nation&#8217;s brightest technology minds. The NSA absolutely needs to stay ahead of the technology curve and adopt leading-edge tools. That&#8217;s not inconsistent with wanting there to be a better framework to ensure that the applications of these technologies are legal and are used consistent with the nation&#8217;s system of checks and balances. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homeland Security Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NSA revelations: the Bureau strikes back</title>
		<link>http://www.hlswatch.com/2005/12/19/thoughts-on-the-nsa-revelations/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Homeland Security Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NSA revelations: the Bureau strikes back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 06:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hlswatch.com/?p=89#comment-89</guid>
		<description>[...] The article notes how NSA was forced to disguise the source of its leads to such an extent that it hindered the FBI&#8217;s ability to discern how it should respond to leads. This is another data point in support of the key argument in my initial response to the NSA story: that fighting the war on terror by taking &#8217;short cuts&#8217; or operating in a legal grey zone is ultimately the less effective strategy for combating the threats that we face. There&#8217;s something inherently wrong with a system where you can&#8217;t even trust the nation&#8217;s lead law enforcement agency with any context on collected intelligence. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The article notes how NSA was forced to disguise the source of its leads to such an extent that it hindered the FBI&#8217;s ability to discern how it should respond to leads. This is another data point in support of the key argument in my initial response to the NSA story: that fighting the war on terror by taking &#8217;short cuts&#8217; or operating in a legal grey zone is ultimately the less effective strategy for combating the threats that we face. There&#8217;s something inherently wrong with a system where you can&#8217;t even trust the nation&#8217;s lead law enforcement agency with any context on collected intelligence. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homeland Security Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Non-story of the day: CBP opens international mail</title>
		<link>http://www.hlswatch.com/2005/12/19/thoughts-on-the-nsa-revelations/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Homeland Security Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Non-story of the day: CBP opens international mail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 18:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hlswatch.com/?p=89#comment-57</guid>
		<description>[...] There are certainly cases where the government has overreached on privacy and civil liberties issues, as I&#8217;ve written about on this site, and I think the media is doing a commendable job of bringing issues such as the recent disclosures about the NSA to public attention. But the media needs to do a better job of discerning between real &#8220;Big Brother&#8221; concerns and red herrings such as this story, rather than crying wolf in response to any scrap of evidence that supports a theory of malicious government overreach. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are certainly cases where the government has overreached on privacy and civil liberties issues, as I&#8217;ve written about on this site, and I think the media is doing a commendable job of bringing issues such as the recent disclosures about the NSA to public attention. But the media needs to do a better job of discerning between real &#8220;Big Brother&#8221; concerns and red herrings such as this story, rather than crying wolf in response to any scrap of evidence that supports a theory of malicious government overreach. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homeland Security Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More NSA revelations from the New York Times</title>
		<link>http://www.hlswatch.com/2005/12/19/thoughts-on-the-nsa-revelations/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Homeland Security Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More NSA revelations from the New York Times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 08:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hlswatch.com/?p=89#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] But this story reinforces what I wrote last Monday in this post, and my sense that the extra-legal path that has been chosen by the Administration will harm our efforts to fight the war on terror in the long-run, for all of the potential short-run benefits. A story like this has the potential to tar ALL data mining and data analysis activities in the government, without making distinctions between activities based upon their security benefits, built-in privacy protections, and consistency with other legal and societal norms. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But this story reinforces what I wrote last Monday in this post, and my sense that the extra-legal path that has been chosen by the Administration will harm our efforts to fight the war on terror in the long-run, for all of the potential short-run benefits. A story like this has the potential to tar ALL data mining and data analysis activities in the government, without making distinctions between activities based upon their security benefits, built-in privacy protections, and consistency with other legal and societal norms. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

