Homeland Security Watch

News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security

February 28, 2006

Jeffrey Runge named acting DHS S&T undersecretary

Filed under: DHS News — by Christian Beckner on February 28, 2006

From a White House press release today:

The President intends to designate Jeffrey William Runge, of North Carolina, to be Acting Under Secretary for Science and Technology at the Department of Homeland Security.

Runge is currently the DHS Chief Medical Officer, a position created by Sec. Chertoff last July that reports to the Undersecretary for Preparedness. I don’t really understand the rationale behind this decision. The Chief Medical Officer has a very important role to play in strengthening DHS’s role for pandemic flu and bioterrorism preparedness, and giving him temporary double-duty as acting S&T undersecretary could slow down these efforts. Why not choose someone already within S&T as acting undersecretary and then move quickly to nominate someone for the job on a full-time basis?

Update (2/28): House HSC ranking member Bennie Thompson (D-MS) weighs in on this appointment in a Washington Technology story:

Thompson, the ranking Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee, praised Runge as “very capable and talented,” but also cautioned against filling two posts with one person.

“While I have the utmost respect for Runge’s abilities to adequately handle the responsibilities of these two positions simultaneously, it will be an enormous challenge,” Thompson said in a statement. “It is my hope that secretary Chertoff will move expeditiously to fill either … position to ensure that nothing falls through the cracks.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • LinkedIn

1 Comment »

318

Comment by William R. Cumming

February 28, 2006 @ 4:22 am

Probably only acting and will not be sent up for confirmation. The distinction between applied and basic research has never been settled for this Directorate and that is the “to be or not to be” question if it is to be successful. Note that its budget is severly constrined by the administration which continues to hope that mispent DOD expenditures will somehow end up assisting domestic homeland security. This Directorate could easily be doubled or tripled in size without coming close to performing as well as the TSWG or DARPA.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>