Homeland Security Watch

News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security

March 9, 2006

Hearing looks at DHS budget request for preparedness

Filed under: Budgets and Spending,Preparedness and Response — by Christian Beckner on March 9, 2006

The House Homeland Security Committee held a hearing on Wednesday with DHS Undersecretary for Preparedness George Foresman on the FY 2007 budget request for the Preparedness Directorate. This is the first budget cycle for the Preparedness Directorate, which was announced following the Second-Stage Review and formally stood up in the last 3-4 months. The official DHS and OMB budget documents released in early February provided scant detail on the directorate, so Foresman’s testimony at this hearing helps to fill in key gaps. For example, it provides additional detail on the National Preparedness Integration Program, a new $50m program announced in the FY 2007 budget request that looks like it will be a focal point of the directorate’s activities. From Foresman’s testimony:

Central to this effort is the creation of the National Preparedness Integration Program (NPIP). The FY07 request for this initiative is $50 million and would support the Directorate by providing a centralized mechanism for promoting integration and synchronization of preparedness across jurisdictions and all levels of government, and between the public and private sectors. By standardizing a common, consistent doctrine and approach to guide planning, training, exercise and program management, we will be able to link and integrate currently independent activities across federal, state, local, and private sector organizations. Standardization allows us to better measure performance so we can individually and collectively assess our progress. That is not the case today, and it keeps us from answering your most basic question: How much better prepared are we? This will allow us to evaluate preparedness from state to state and city to city – as well as nationally.

Management matters. And NPIP is absolutely critical to the Department’s ability to manage the individual as part of the collective, because as we all know, what one organization does often affects other areas – especially in homeland security.

The NPIP seems like a sensible addition to DHS’s portfolio of activities. Hopefully DHS will provide additional details on their strategy for it and for the entire directorate in the coming months.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • LinkedIn



Comment by William R. Cumming

March 9, 2006 @ 11:17 am

Was Foresman ever confirmed by the Senate or is he just another “Acting”? Also, it is interesting that the NPIP will cost $50M when in the past less than 5% of that was spent on preparedness integration. Hope Congress approves this money because without this expenditure and a successful effort the rest of the DHS money is wasted.


Comment by William R. Cumming

March 9, 2006 @ 4:55 pm

George Foresman was confirmed by the United States Senate by voice vote on December 8th, 2005.
He was confirmed as the Under Secretary for Preparedness a postion created by the 2SR proposal that was approved by Congress in the DHS appropriation act.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>