Homeland Security Watch

News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security

March 21, 2006

The FCC creates a homeland security division

Filed under: Infrastructure Protection — by Christian Beckner on March 21, 2006

Washington Technology reports today on the Federal Communication Commission’s decision to create a new homeland security division:

The Federal Communications Commission voted unanimously on March 17 to establish a new Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau.

The new unit will oversee issues such as disaster management, spectrum licensing for public safety agencies, 911 call centers, and alert and warning communications, the FCC said in a news release. Furthermore, the unit will address communications infrastructure protection and interoperability for public safety.

Congress must be notified of the changes before they become effective, and the commission must secure union approval for issues affecting its workforce.

The new bureau will handle functions that had been spread among seven different bureaus, including enhanced 911 requirements, priority emergency communications, continuity of government operations planning, network reliability, and resiliency and network security.

One aspect of this decision that this story doesn’t address is the FCC office’s relation to the Office of Cyber Security and Telecommunications at the Department of Homeland Security, which has responsibilities for protecting the nation’s telecom infrastructure. There’s a risk of mission overlap and confusion between the FCC and DHS, particularly on the infrastructure protection mission. Perhaps there’s a need for Congress to clarify their respective roles and responsibilities.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • LinkedIn



Comment by William R. Cumming

March 24, 2006 @ 10:43 am

Definitely agree that there is great potential for confusion and overlap between the FCC and DHS. I think that just a quick glance at the following Title 47 CFR regs justifies that conclusion (most of which have not been updated to even reflect the existence of DHS). For example, 47 CFR Parts 11, 67, 201-212 would be a good start. The transfer of the NCS to DHS also needs to be thoroughly sorted out. See Executive Order 12656 as amended and other related EOs.


Comment by William R. Cumming

March 24, 2006 @ 10:49 am

Correction and additon! 47 CFR Part 64 should be listed and E.O. 12472, as amended.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>