Homeland Security Watch

News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security

April 13, 2006

Al-Qaeda vs. the Google toolbar

Filed under: Intelligence and Info-Sharing,Technology for HLS — by Christian Beckner on April 13, 2006

The Washington Post has a very interesting story today on the extent to which terrorist groups are increasingly wary about how their internet-based activity can be tracked or monitored:

The Internet has long been a convenient gathering place for radical Islamists advocating violence against Western influences, known as jihadists. Through online chat, e-mail and Web postings, communities of people have relied on one another for advice, political debate, even movie reviews and biographical information on suicide bombers and religious leaders.

Recently, postings on jihadist Web sites have expressed increasing concern about spyware, password protection, and surveillance on chat rooms and instant-messaging systems.

One forum recently posted a guide for Internet safety and anonymity on the Internet, advising readers of ways to circumvent hackers or government officials.

“The Shortened Way of How to be Cautious; To the User of the Jihadi Forums, In the Name of Allah, the most Gracious and Merciful” was posted last month by an al-Qaeda-affiliated group calling itself the Global Islamic Media Front and was translated by the SITE Institute, a group that tracks international terrorist groups…

Google Inc. and its growing arsenal of powerful software tools, for example, are both a boon and a bane for terrorist technologists who are increasingly wary that the programs might be turned against them to gather information about their activities. One of the jihadist Web sites cautioned its readers to “Beware of Google!!!” with specific warnings about its relatively new product Google Toolbar. The posting cited another technology blog that said the tool could be configured to operate like spyware, finding data on computers remotely.

The only constant in terrorist tradecraft has always been adaptation, so it’s not surprising to see new caution in response to things like spyware and advanced search tools. This creates new challenges for U.S. intelligence efforts, but on the flipside, it also makes it slightly more difficult for terrorists to communicate with each other and conduct recruiting activities online.

This will likely be a cat-and-mouse game for years to come. It will not be easy to keep pace with new efforts by terrorists to mask or hide activity, given the ubiquity of tools that enable privacy and security, but it’s worthwhile in my opinion for intelligence agencies to try to stay ahead of the curve.

For more information on this broader issue, I recommend checking out Gabriel Weimann’s new book, Terror on the Internet, which is being published this month.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • LinkedIn



Comment by Tristan

April 13, 2006 @ 1:27 pm

This post article is just blatant propaganda to inspire the techno-illiterate into a frenzy so that they will willingly give up the last shred of internet privacy so that the government can make them feel safe
I wonder what the post is trying to accomplish by outright accusing google of aiding terrorists


Comment by Scott

April 13, 2006 @ 2:18 pm

What? That isnt what it said at all? Please re-read before wasting everyone time with your lame interpretation. The article is about the way that google could be used to TRACK and IDENTIFY terrorists who have it installed but dont understand the ability of the google toolbar to track and log a users internet activity. Yes it is spyware (to a small extent)


Comment by Karl Mull

April 13, 2006 @ 11:15 pm

Why cant homeland security be in charge of state Ports of entry? Be a good use of the money their wasting!

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>