Homeland Security Watch

News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security

April 26, 2006

CBP’s UAV crashs on the US-Mexico border

Filed under: Border Security,Technology for HLS — by Christian Beckner on April 26, 2006

From the Arizona Daily Star:

Border Patrol officials are investigating the Tuesday morning crash of a Predator-B spy drone, according to the Department of Homeland Security’s office of Customs and Border Protection in Washington, D.C.

Spokesman Michael Friel said operators lost contact with the $14 million unmanned plane about 2:50 a.m. as it patrolled the border at 12,000 to 15,000 feet. Efforts to re-establish contact were not successful….

The Predator, called an unmanned aerial vehicle, is remotely controlled through satellite communication, and its cameras and sensing equipment are able to see through clouds from up to 50,000 feet.

Friel said the Border Patrol began deploying the Predator last September. Since Oct. 1, it has flown more than 900 hours and is credited with the apprehension of 1,793 illegal entrants and 200 pounds of marijuana.

This crash happened just as the Senate was preparing to vote to add $1.9 billion in funding for border security to the FY 2006 supplemental bill, including new funds for UAVs. Before CBP buys new or replacement UAVs, I think that careful thought needs to be given as to whether they are cost-effective. Based on the facts in the story above, the cost-per-apprehension for this UAV was $7,808. If I make a similar calculation for the Border Patrol ($1.4 billion annual budget, 1.2 million apprehensions in 2005), the cost-per-apprehension is $1,166. This is admittedly an imperfect comparison, because there are other budget items that impact on the apprehension totals, and because UAVs should presumably have an average useful life that is longer than eight months – but I still think that it’s telling.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print

1 Comment »

804

Comment by Ed

April 30, 2006 @ 12:08 am

Why are we using a UAV over non-hostile airspace? The beauty of UAVs lies in their use in airspace where they are very likely to be shot down. I am not aware of any attempts to shoot down aircraft along the border – except perhaps by the government. At $14 million per UAV and a a huge ground support crew, it would be quite a bit cheaper to fly piloted aircraft, including the pilots’ salaries. A light twin aircraft could be had for half a million, by comparison, and needs a small staff to keep it flying. Figure in salaries and its still way cheaper.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>