<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBP&#8217;s UAV crashs on the US-Mexico border</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hlswatch.com/2006/04/26/cbps-uav-crashs-on-the-us-mexico-border/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hlswatch.com/2006/04/26/cbps-uav-crashs-on-the-us-mexico-border/</link>
	<description>News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:26:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.hlswatch.com/2006/04/26/cbps-uav-crashs-on-the-us-mexico-border/comment-page-1/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hlswatch.com/?p=642#comment-804</guid>
		<description>Why are we using a UAV over non-hostile airspace? The beauty of UAVs lies in their use in airspace where they are very likely to be shot down. I am not aware of any attempts to shoot down aircraft along the border - except perhaps &lt;i&gt;by&lt;/i&gt; the government. At $14 million per UAV and a a huge ground support crew, it would be quite a bit cheaper to fly piloted aircraft, including the pilots&#039; salaries. A light twin aircraft could be had for half a million, by comparison, and needs a small staff to keep it flying. Figure in salaries and its still way cheaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are we using a UAV over non-hostile airspace? The beauty of UAVs lies in their use in airspace where they are very likely to be shot down. I am not aware of any attempts to shoot down aircraft along the border &#8211; except perhaps <i>by</i> the government. At $14 million per UAV and a a huge ground support crew, it would be quite a bit cheaper to fly piloted aircraft, including the pilots&#8217; salaries. A light twin aircraft could be had for half a million, by comparison, and needs a small staff to keep it flying. Figure in salaries and its still way cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

