<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DHS approps passes the Senate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hlswatch.com/2006/07/17/dhs-approps-passes-the-senate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hlswatch.com/2006/07/17/dhs-approps-passes-the-senate/</link>
	<description>News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security today.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Homeland Security Watch &#187; Explosives detection R&#38;D: the DHS record</title>
		<link>http://www.hlswatch.com/2006/07/17/dhs-approps-passes-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-11155</link>
		<dc:creator>Homeland Security Watch &#187; Explosives detection R&#38;D: the DHS record</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 20:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hlswatch.com/2006/07/17/dhs-approps-passes-the-senate/#comment-11155</guid>
		<description>[...] The phrase &#8220;forcing lawmakers to rescind&#8221; is a bit facetious. While it&#8217;s true that DHS S&amp;T&#8217;s performance has been problematic in many respects, nobody forced Congress to rescind this money during the FY 2007 appropriations process. Congress made a deliberate decision to increase funds for state &amp; local grant programs by raiding S&amp;T&#8217;s budget last month. As I noted several weeks ago, &#8220;The increases in funds for these programs are made by increasing a rescission to DHSâ€™s FY â€˜06 science &amp; technology budget and cutting the DHS management budget respectively - both questionable judgments, in my opinion.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The phrase &#8220;forcing lawmakers to rescind&#8221; is a bit facetious. While it&#8217;s true that DHS S&#38;T&#8217;s performance has been problematic in many respects, nobody forced Congress to rescind this money during the FY 2007 appropriations process. Congress made a deliberate decision to increase funds for state &#38; local grant programs by raiding S&#38;T&#8217;s budget last month. As I noted several weeks ago, &#8220;The increases in funds for these programs are made by increasing a rescission to DHSâ€™s FY â€˜06 science &#38; technology budget and cutting the DHS management budget respectively - both questionable judgments, in my opinion.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EmergencyTech.org &#187; DHS Appropriations Pass Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.hlswatch.com/2006/07/17/dhs-approps-passes-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-9090</link>
		<dc:creator>EmergencyTech.org &#187; DHS Appropriations Pass Senate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hlswatch.com/2006/07/17/dhs-approps-passes-the-senate/#comment-9090</guid>
		<description>[...] Via HLSW   Budgets &amp; Spending, Homeland SecurityThese icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via HLSW   Budgets &#38; Spending, Homeland SecurityThese icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
