<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DHS FY07 approps emerges from conference</title>
	<link>http://www.hlswatch.com/2006/09/25/dhs-fy07-approps-emerges-from-conference/</link>
	<description>News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security today.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Coward</title>
		<link>http://www.hlswatch.com/2006/09/25/dhs-fy07-approps-emerges-from-conference/#comment-16584</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hlswatch.com/2006/09/25/dhs-fy07-approps-emerges-from-conference/#comment-16584</guid>
		<description>Why is it that the Preparedness Directorate front office received $44M less than what they requested?  U/S Foresman and A/S Zitz are both savvy enough to know how to secure funding.  Is that a signal that they will indeed be merging with FEMA sometime in FY2007, per Congressional direction, and that there will be a reduced need for back-office functions in Preparedness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that the Preparedness Directorate front office received $44M less than what they requested?  U/S Foresman and A/S Zitz are both savvy enough to know how to secure funding.  Is that a signal that they will indeed be merging with FEMA sometime in FY2007, per Congressional direction, and that there will be a reduced need for back-office functions in Preparedness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
