November 5, 2007
3 Comments »
Pingback by New DHS Technology Task Force Underway
November 13, 2007 @ 4:15 pm
[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]
Comment by Lost in Space
December 12, 2007 @ 4:35 pm
One of the more disturbing things that I’ve seen in Government contracting is the DHS EAGLE contract. Although there are major benefits to DHS such as the ability to expedite the procurement process reducing time, cost and effort there are also some major adverse effects that are manifesting themselves.
Based on the volume and velocity of the solicitations, SI’s are passing on opportunities because they simply don’t have the time or bandwidth to muster the capture teams to even study the requirements.
More importantly, the solicitations are not made public. Emerging technology companies cannot see the requirements and are unable to approach the SI community with solution briefs.
These two issues will cause DHS to suffer from un-fair competition which is preventing emerging innovation from reaching DHS decision makers.
Comment by Quemann
February 17, 2008 @ 6:27 pm
The on-going security checks and mass surveillance, based mainly on RFID and biometric technology,won’t be an optimal solution longer term. The reason is the above-mentioned technology is to search terror suspects one by one. In other words, it is a “brute force search”, which is to leave no stone unturned for a Pyrrhic achievement. To embrace more emerging technologies, you guys have to keep the doors wide open for unsolicited proposals, instead of limiting acceptability to RFP proposals. The reason is simple:
innovation can hardly be relied on corporate titans who are busy on a cash cow buyout frenzy and whose lab benches are loaded with forensic tools to counter and circumvent competitors.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
