Homeland Security Watch

News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security

February 1, 2008

DHS Small Vessel Security Summit Outlines Concrete Recommendations

Filed under: Port and Maritime Security,Strategy — by Jonah Czerwinski on February 1, 2008

DHS convened a major National Small Vessel Security Summit late last year, and the after action report is now available. While I first considered small boat security to be about as niche a topic as is possible (with more public affairs appeal than public policy), this report shows a heck of a lot of work went into the effort of making the event productive and relevant on a national scale.  The report was prepared by the Homeland Security Institute and, at 122 pages, is a daunting read. Especially with so few pictures. HLSWatch readers get the cliffs notes.  Main recommendations of the effort are as follows:

1.  AIS tracking technologies should not be required for vessels under 65 feet in length until the technology is perfected (read: likely never), the cost of such technology significantly reduced (read: paid by the Feds), and until law enforcement has the ability to track and respond to all vessels in the maritime domain (read: moveable goalpost). RFID technology or other OnStar-like monitoring features can be used in the meantime.

2.  The National Homeland Security Strategy needs a component that represents a National Small Vessel Security Strategy based on a layered defense. (Echoes of the WME Task Force.) This strategy should not, the report explains, focus on deterring a specific type of terrorist attack but should enhance the overall safety and security of the maritime domain. Rightly, the forum recommends that the strategy provide for guidance in coordination with international partners.

3.  Licensing, registration, or tracking of small boats used by private individuals should be accomplished by DHS with the lightest of touch. Failing to do so will be costly, ineffective, and rood (it will “alienate the small vessel operator”).

4.  State, local, tribal, and territorial maritime law enforcement entities need additional funding because, in addition to “other public safety and security missions,” this is too much.

5.  Establish a universal hotline telephone number, similar to the National Response Center 1-800 number, for the boating community to use in reporting suspicious activities and emergency situations.

6.  States could add a boat operator credential — like those required for tractor trailer or school bus drivers — to their state driver licenses. This could lead to a national boat registry for use by law enforcement agencies.

7.  The U.S. should enhance international cooperation and intelligence sharing with “our foreign counterparts,” especially Mexico, Canada, and countries of the Caribbean because these nations are the most likely departure points for a small vessel terrorist attack from overseas.

8.  More fusion centers! The report explains that conference participants felt that additional fusion centers would enable stakeholders to better share, analyze, and disseminate intelligence to with the USCG, CPB, U.S. Navy, the Harbor Master and state and local law enforcement agencies.

9.  Permanent Employment of the DNDO Act: Conference participants believe that federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies should be “provided with nuclear detection devices so they can detect radioactive signatures on small vessel and in cargo.” The rest of this language is worth reprinting:

The cost of such equipment requires federal guidance and oversight. In addition, the federal government should develop RAD/NUC detection devices with a stand-off capability in order to provide detection without directly impacting small vessel operators. The federal government should also consider placing nuclear detection devices on commercial vessels in a partnership to increase the chance of detecting a nuclear device or nuclear material before it reaches a major U.S. port or population center. Lastly, the federal government needs to strengthen counter-proliferation initiatives with our foreign counterparts to prevent shipments of WMD, their delivery systems, or related materials from reaching the U.S. maritime domain.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • LinkedIn


Pingback by Available Domain » Blog Archive » DHS Small Vessel Security Summit Outlines Concrete Recommendations

February 1, 2008 @ 7:06 pm

[…] Original post by Homeland Security Watch […]

Pingback by Available Domain » Blog Archive » DHS Small Vessel Security Summit Outlines Concrete Recs

February 1, 2008 @ 7:33 pm

[…] Original post by Homeland Security Watch […]

Pingback by Pages tagged "the appeal"

February 1, 2008 @ 7:44 pm

[…] bookmarks tagged the appeal DHS Small Vessel Security Summit Outlines Concrete… saved by 4 others     qmikeslimdaron bookmarked on 02/01/08 | […]

Pingback by Domain Forum » Blog Archive » DHS Small Vessel Security Summit Outlines Concrete Recs

February 1, 2008 @ 9:03 pm

[…] Original post by Homeland Security Watch […]

Comment by William R. Cumming

February 2, 2008 @ 2:15 pm

This is an important report but like all analysis unlikely to result in Congress or anyone else paying attention. Maybe the forthcoming recession will reduce small boat deployments together with higher energy costs. I could argue that boats under 65 ft are the real threat for WMD.

Comment by Human

February 3, 2008 @ 10:06 pm

The real threat is from agencies like the “Department of Homeland Security”. The Police State in all it’s manifestations is the Enemy of The People. If you all want to catch any Terrorists, just arrest the Mass Murderers in the White House. In the meantime, read up on the 10 basic Freedoms found in the Constitution. They are labeled the Bill of Rights.

Pingback by Homeland Security Watch » HLSWatch Interviewed on NPR’s “Homeland Security Inside & Out”

March 3, 2008 @ 9:34 am

[…] post we ran here about federal efforts to address threats posed by small boats was the subject of an interview […]

Comment by Minebrowse

September 4, 2016 @ 2:34 pm

I installed java but my computer keeps asking me stating “to use the java command-line tool you need to install a JDK” : any thoughts about what this is all about ? Many thanks

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>