<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Resilience Debate Begins</title>
	<link>http://www.hlswatch.com/2008/05/08/the-resilience-debate-begins/</link>
	<description>News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security today.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: William R. Cumming</title>
		<link>http://www.hlswatch.com/2008/05/08/the-resilience-debate-begins/#comment-104121</link>
		<dc:creator>William R. Cumming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.hlswatch.com/2008/05/08/the-resilience-debate-begins/#comment-104121</guid>
		<description>It would interesting to see if the VPs for Risk Management now in vogue in large caps and mid-caps corporate structures view resiliency as something to plan and pay for or just another unfunded mandate from the FEDS. Hope critical analysis is forthcoming. Congress should fund more studies of this issue. If there is a public benefit, so be it. If none then probably no need for market economics to not control. Don't know if this requires macro or micro analysis but probably both by many disciplines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would interesting to see if the VPs for Risk Management now in vogue in large caps and mid-caps corporate structures view resiliency as something to plan and pay for or just another unfunded mandate from the FEDS. Hope critical analysis is forthcoming. Congress should fund more studies of this issue. If there is a public benefit, so be it. If none then probably no need for market economics to not control. Don&#8217;t know if this requires macro or micro analysis but probably both by many disciplines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
