And thanks for the info. Now while looking like governmentese (sic–not sure there is such a word) I would like to know Jessica even discounting the fact that you are a lawyer {and remember was once myself] how do you think the S&T Directorate could make its biggest contribution? Mini-DARPA? Supporting DOE labs and FFRDC’s so closely analyzing developing private sector techology that might be of use to DHS? In other words small contracts! Asking the Patent Office to notify it of patent applications of utility to DHS? Formal liaison with DARPA? With the TSIWG [Technical----Working Group]? Running something like the Defense Science Board? Having a rep attend all meetings of the DSb? In other words what have been the S&T Directorate successes in their mind so far and of course their failures? Is S&T a learning organization or just another vehicle to stimulate private sector contractors that may or may not produce deliverables even reports of interest? I personally supported the formation of an S&T Directorate in the Homeland Security Act of 2002 and the legislative process that led to its passage. Just wondering whether others who supported it think it is as important to DHS long-run success as I do?

By the way the one entry in your listing of their mission that I would like to know how they view their success or failure so far as an organization is set forth next:

“Providing leadership and resources to develop the intellectual basis that is essential to future mission success”

As for S&T’s specific mission, here is how it is described on the the DHS website:

Mission and Objectives

The S&T Directorate, in partnership with the private sector, national laboratories, universities, and other government agencies (domestic and foreign), helps push the innovation envelope and drive development and the use of high technology in support of homeland security.

The Directorate is focusing on enabling its customers—the Department components—and their customers, including Border Patrol agents, Coast Guardsmen, airport baggage screeners, federal air marshals, and state, local, and federal emergency responders, as well as the many others teamed and committed to the vital mission of securing the nation.

To reach its goals, the S&T Directorate is:

* Creating a customer-focused, output-oriented, full-service science and technology management organization that is consistent with its enabling legislation

* Incorporating lessons learned since the start-up of Department to sharpen its focus on executing mission-oriented programs

* Providing leadership and resources to develop the intellectual basis that is essential to future mission success

Also, Dr. O’Toole would not be the first non-military/non-flag rank person to lead S&T. Charles McQueary served as the first Undersecretary of S&T. Dr. McQueary was an engineer by background with significant experience in the defense industry base but I don’t believe he was military. (Feel free to correct if I’m recalling Dr. McQueary’s background incorrecty).