Comments on: RECAP/ANALYSIS: A Discussion on Immigration Policy with Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano http://www.hlswatch.com/2009/11/13/recapanalysis-a-discussion-on-immigration-policy-with-homeland-security-secretary-janet-napolitano/ News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security today. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:07:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: William R. Cumming http://www.hlswatch.com/2009/11/13/recapanalysis-a-discussion-on-immigration-policy-with-homeland-security-secretary-janet-napolitano/comment-page-1/#comment-137295 William R. Cumming Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:17:41 +0000 http://www.hlswatch.com/?p=7360#comment-137295 One further point. IN 1940 the population of Mexico was 40 million. Today over 100 million. One further point. IN 1940 the population of Mexico was 40 million. Today over 100 million.

]]> By: William R. Cumming http://www.hlswatch.com/2009/11/13/recapanalysis-a-discussion-on-immigration-policy-with-homeland-security-secretary-janet-napolitano/comment-page-1/#comment-137294 William R. Cumming Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:16:54 +0000 http://www.hlswatch.com/?p=7360#comment-137294 Mary! Am I wrong I thought the US Cavalry and Apache Scouts working for the Army brought down Manugs Colorados? Not Mexicans! Mary! Am I wrong I thought the US Cavalry and Apache Scouts working for the Army brought down Manugs Colorados? Not Mexicans!

]]> By: Mary H. Puckett http://www.hlswatch.com/2009/11/13/recapanalysis-a-discussion-on-immigration-policy-with-homeland-security-secretary-janet-napolitano/comment-page-1/#comment-137293 Mary H. Puckett Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:09:33 +0000 http://www.hlswatch.com/?p=7360#comment-137293 You America/American's are the "New Apache". I am a great, great, great grand daughter of the Apchae Chief Manugs Colorados of New Mexico/Az. We the Apache Nation lost our homeland/country you call New Mexico/Az. to unlimited legal and illegal immigration from Mexico. If you care to know of the path you are on now get a copy of "Apache" by Will Levinton Comfort. It is the life and times of Mangus Colorados. In the end he lost his life in one last stand aginst illegal immigrats to the land of the Apache. YOU ARE THE NEW APACHE, and it is not a good thing. Mary H. Puckett You America/American’s are the “New Apache”.
I am a great, great, great grand daughter of the Apchae Chief Manugs Colorados of New Mexico/Az.

We the Apache Nation lost our homeland/country you call New Mexico/Az. to unlimited legal and illegal immigration from Mexico.

If you care to know of the path you are on now get a copy of “Apache” by Will Levinton Comfort. It is the life and times of Mangus Colorados. In the end he lost his life in one last stand aginst illegal immigrats to the land of the Apache.

YOU ARE THE NEW APACHE, and it is not a good thing.

Mary H. Puckett

]]> By: William R. Cumming http://www.hlswatch.com/2009/11/13/recapanalysis-a-discussion-on-immigration-policy-with-homeland-security-secretary-janet-napolitano/comment-page-1/#comment-137292 William R. Cumming Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:56:38 +0000 http://www.hlswatch.com/?p=7360#comment-137292 This is a very helpful post Jessica so thanks much! Readers of this blog may note my take on immigration is quite different in approach from the usual. First, we need to separate out Mexico generally from the legal/illegal immigration issue. Why, in reality we (the US) and Mexico are one contiguous geographic area and more than many know are in reality one country. Doing this paradigm shift shows how heavily Mexico changes the picture on US demographics, economics, social policy, FDI, energy, resources generally, and a host of other factors. It also allows illegal immigration to be put in a sharper perspective. Personally, whateve the long-term results of her time at the helm of Arizona (a now deeply impoverfrished state largely because of bad or no decisions in her tenure)what did not happen is that she contributed to a long-term solution. Most expert commentators on immigration reform thought the Bush/Certoff bill a good one and killed by the Republicans in the Senate. Whatever her party affiliation go back and review her comments on that bill and the immense effort made by Chertoff to gain reform. Probably IMO his (Chertoff's)biggest contribution to the long term as Secretary DHS and certainly not his anti-terrorism and counter-terrorism efforts or further destruction of FEMA morale by his 2SR reorganization. So she has had almost a year and where is this adminsitration's bill or even a flyspecking of the Bush-Chertoff bill? Talk is cheap let's have "Change." And of course when TEXAS' current succession for the UNION effort succeeds my paradigm will be even more accurate. Being facetious of course. I certainly would support a Constitutional Amendment stating that no one with successionist sympathy or such a state where that is even a significant minority view can become President or member of Congress. Think of a pre-civil war Congress without Clay or Calhoun? Odd thing is Lincoln supported Clay and of course also lost his seat in Congress opposing war with Mexico. It just goes round and round does it not? This is a very helpful post Jessica so thanks much! Readers of this blog may note my take on immigration is quite different in approach from the usual. First, we need to separate out Mexico generally from the legal/illegal immigration issue. Why, in reality we (the US) and Mexico are one contiguous geographic area and more than many know are in reality one country. Doing this paradigm shift shows how heavily Mexico changes the picture on US demographics, economics, social policy, FDI, energy, resources generally, and a host of other factors. It also allows illegal immigration to be put in a sharper perspective. Personally, whateve the long-term results of her time at the helm of Arizona (a now deeply impoverfrished state largely because of bad or no decisions in her tenure)what did not happen is that she contributed to a long-term solution. Most expert commentators on immigration reform thought the Bush/Certoff bill a good one and killed by the Republicans in the Senate. Whatever her party affiliation go back and review her comments on that bill and the immense effort made by Chertoff to gain reform. Probably IMO his (Chertoff’s)biggest contribution to the long term as Secretary DHS and certainly not his anti-terrorism and counter-terrorism efforts or further destruction of FEMA morale by his 2SR reorganization. So she has had almost a year and where is this adminsitration’s bill or even a flyspecking of the Bush-Chertoff bill? Talk is cheap let’s have “Change.” And of course when TEXAS’ current succession for the UNION effort succeeds my paradigm will be even more accurate. Being facetious of course. I certainly would support a Constitutional Amendment stating that no one with successionist sympathy or such a state where that is even a significant minority view can become President or member of Congress. Think of a pre-civil war Congress without Clay or Calhoun? Odd thing is Lincoln supported Clay and of course also lost his seat in Congress opposing war with Mexico. It just goes round and round does it not?

]]>