Homeland Security Watch

News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security

December 3, 2010

Tis the season to… deal directly with religious difference

Filed under: Preparedness and Response,Radicalization,Terrorist Threats & Attacks — by Philip J. Palin on December 3, 2010

The first Hanukkah candle was lit Wednesday night. Tonight there will be three.  Today in 1763 the first synagogue in what was to become the United States was dedicated in Newport, Rhode Island.

In many Christian churches December 3 is the feast day of St. Francis Xavier, co-founder of the Jesuits and missionary to India.   Today the Eastern Church remembers the martyrs Agapius, Seleucus, and Mamas.

Next Tuesday, December 7, is New Year’s Day on the Islamic calendar.  Shia Muslims will remember Ashura — the martyrdom of Ali, grandson of the Prophet –on December 15.

On December 8 many Mahayana Buddhists, especially in Japan, celebrate the Enlightenment of Siddhartha Gautama.  This is sometimes called Bodhi Day.

The inter-faith calendar could easily be expanded and extended.  The darkness of the northern hemisphere’s winter seems to have made these next few weeks especially full of religious memorials.

The wanna-be bomber in Portland and the arson of the Islamic center in Corvallis are the latest in a series of events that highlight the religious challenges of our age.  Long before the “Ground Zero Mosque” or even 9/11, Samuel Huntington described a clash of civilizations erupting along cultural boundaries largely defined by religious belief. In the current issue of Foreign Affairs we are told to be ready for even more religious turmoil in the next thirty years. (See “A Globalized God” and “The Rise of Mezzanine Rulers”.)

My identity is of a generation, a social class, and a region that was taught to use civic language — and avoid religious language — in secular space.  Whatever the merits of that old discipline, it is increasingly abandoned. Today and in six weekend posts I will leave these restraints mostly behind.

Over the next three weeks I will use Saturday and Sunday to post some thoughts on six excerpts of Christian scripture I perceive to be specifically relevant to inter-faith relations and, therefore, to homeland security.  I will finish the series on Christmas Eve. 

The texts all relate to what Jesus said about the Samaritans. In the New Testament the inter-religious issue is framed as between Jews and Gentiles (mostly Hellenistic peoples) and between Jews and Samaritans. The relationship between first century Jew and Samaritan was especially tense, reflecting how much was shared between the two religious traditions.  It seems to me there are clear analogies for contemporary Jews, Christians, and Muslims.

The Samaritans were (and are) a people centered in a region north of Jerusalem. Samaritan origins are disputed. The Samaritans themselves claim to be descendants of the twelve tribes of Israel, especially the northern tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh. The Samaritans see themselves as a remnant of the Northern Kingdom that survived Assyrian exile. Jews who returned to Jerusalem after the Babylonian captivity considered the Samaritans an entirely separate people, despite a wide range of linguistic, geographic, and theological proximities.

The Samaritans consider themselves the true descendents of Moses. The Samaritan Bible is almost identical to the first five books of the Jewish Bible. But the Samaritans do not consider the other books – the prophets and readings – to be sacred. The Samaritans focus their tradition at Shechem and Mt. Gerizim. The Jews (Judeans) looked to Jerusalem and Mt. Zion.

It was roughly 500 years from the reestablishment of the second temple at Jerusalem to the life of Jesus. Over these five centuries the religious differences – rather modest to an outsider – were exacerbated by a host of political and cultural conflicts. To Jewish contemporaries of Jesus the Samaritans were entirely other and spiritually polluted.

How did Jesus engage this otherness?  There are six scriptural references to Samaritans, I will examine each.  I welcome your comments or critique.  More tomorrow.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print

11 Comments »

Comment by Arnold Bogis

December 3, 2010 @ 12:41 am

I will wait for at least some of your additional posts before providing blog-worthy, shallow comment to your obviously deeply considered series of posts.

Instead, for now, I will point out an additional HKS Forum (I should ask for kickbacks at this point…) on the legacy of Sam Huntington (since you raised his clashes thesis): http://www.iop.harvard.edu/Multimedia-Center/All-Videos/The-Legacy-of-Sam-Huntington

Regardless how you come down on the issue, this particular talk is worth watching and includes some heavy hitters: Eliot Cohen, Francis Fukuyama, Gideon Rose, and Fareed Zakaria.

Comment by William R. Cumming

December 3, 2010 @ 8:47 am

So which of these various “religions” clearly and openly renounced violence against innocents?

Do economics and religions clash or are these “political” thought systems sympathetic in encouraging their universal acceptance?

And I always liked Sam Huntington who actually participated and led some task forces for FEMA on its civil defense and Defense Production and mobilization work. And I still think his “Soldier and the State” is must reading for any serving US officer in the Armed Forces, or any literate political appointee (perhaps an oxymoron) and will enjoy listening to Arnold’s referred lecture.

But I have always firmly disagreed with Dr. Huntington’s conclusion that the “military” and its leadership was the last bastion of democracy (protection of our REPUBLIC) since I find that the underlying purpose of the military is organized violence and that is a concept that is inherently destructive to democracy. That is also one of the principal reasons that I believe Homeland Security and Emergency Management are civil governance functions and not military functions. And of course as all readers of this blog know from my comments I deeply regret that it is the Department of Homeland Security and not the Department of Civil Security.

Well Holiday Seasons to all the bloggers, and readers, and other commentators on this blog. And of course to all the believers in the religions mentioned in the post.

I still believe that those whose lives and beliefs affirmation the joy of life and living will long outlive those who take part in organizing the destruction of that life, but perhaps am wrong.

Comment by William R. Cumming

December 3, 2010 @ 9:39 am

And note for the record, the WELSH, my purest anscestry, also believe themselves to be one of the long lost tribes of Israel. Of course those Druids, with their Maypoles, and sacrificing of young female virgins literally or figuratively also seem to be a tradition.

Pingback by Homeland Security Watch » Matthew 10:1-10 Avoid Samaritan Towns

December 4, 2010 @ 12:12 am

[...] is the second in a series.  A preface on the purpose of the series is available at: Tis the season… for dealing directly with religious difference Permalink | | Comment on this Post [...]

Comment by William R. Cumming

December 4, 2010 @ 8:20 am

Arnold! Enjoyed the Huntington Panel presentation and the questioner at the end had an excellent point. All the elements in him (Huntington) were so mixed that the World could stand up and say “Here was a Man”!

Pingback by Homeland Security Watch » John 4:1- 30, The Woman at Jacob’s Well

December 5, 2010 @ 12:31 am

[...] These readings will continue next Saturday. This weekend series began on Friday, December 3 with Tis the season… to deal directly with religious difference. [...]

Pingback by Homeland Security Watch » John 8: Jesus accused of being a Samaritan

December 11, 2010 @ 12:25 am

[...] The first post on December 3 was Tis the season… to deal directly with religious difference. [...]

Pingback by Homeland Security Watch » Luke 9: A Samaritan town rejects Jesus

December 12, 2010 @ 12:39 am

[...] The first post on December 3 was Tis the season… to deal directly with religious difference. [...]

Pingback by Homeland Security Watch » Luke 10: Parable of the Good Samaritan

December 18, 2010 @ 12:28 am

[...] The first post on December 3 was Tis the season… to deal directly with religious difference. [...]

Pingback by Homeland Security Watch » Luke 17: The thankful leper

December 19, 2010 @ 12:50 am

[...] The first post on December 3 was Tis the season… to deal directly with religious difference. [...]

Pingback by Homeland Security Watch » Applying scriptural analogy to the homeland security context

December 24, 2010 @ 12:05 am

[...] The first post on December 3 was Tis the season… to deal directly with religious difference. [...]

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>