I was going to use the Saturday spot to summarize the main points made over the past week in response to Linda Kiltz’s paper. But given the breadth of the responses, I will forego a summary for now. Interested readers who have not followed the conversation should start with the Monday, August 8th post, and look particularly at each day’s comments.
I would like to thank the homeland security watch bloggers and those who commented for using their valuable “cognitive surplus” to contribute to the continuing conversation about homeland security education and professionalism.
I would also like to thank Linda for her scholarship. Linda will post her thoughts about this week’s discussion on Tuesday, August 16th.
I’d like to highlight in the next two posts (immediately above this one): comments from Phil Palin, and from Steve Ricca and his colleagues.
The final post for today summarizes some preliminary findings from an empirical study of homeland security education. The author allowed me to post these findings on homeland security watch, but since the findings and conclusions are still provisional, the author requested not using the author’s name until the study has been finalized. Once it is, I will provide information about how to obtain the full work.