Homeland Security Watch

News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security

December 1, 2011

Against Al-Qaeda: Where bipartisanship finds an uneasy home

Filed under: Congress and HLS,Radicalization,Terrorist Threats & Attacks — by Philip J. Palin on December 1, 2011

The following is quoted verbatim from page A-22 of the New York edition of the November 30 New York Times.  I do not have time for further comment, but felt it was too easy to miss and too important not to call out.  See more at the Times.

By a vote of 61 to 37, the Senate turned back an effort to strip a major military bill of a set of disputed provisions affecting the handling of terrorism cases. While the legislation still has several steps to go, the vote makes it likely that Congress will eventually send to President Obama’s desk a bill that contains detainee-related provisions his national-security team has said are unacceptable.

The most disputed provision would require the government to place into military custody any suspected member of Al Qaeda or one of its allies connected to a plot against the United States or its allies. The provision would exempt American citizens, but would otherwise extend to arrests on United States soil. The executive branch could issue a waiver and keep such a prisoner in the civilian system.

A related provision would create a federal statute saying the government has the legal authority to keep people suspected of terrorism in military custody, indefinitely and without trial. It contains no exception for American citizens. It is intended to bolster the authorization to use military force against the perpetrators of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, which lawmakers enacted a decade ago…

Among Republican senators, there was nearly unanimous support for keeping the detainee provisions in the bill: 44 Republicans voted for them, while two — Mark Kirk of Illinois and Rand Paul of Kentucky — voted to remove them. By contrast, members of the Democratic caucus were deeply divided: 35 wanted to strip the detainee provisions from the bill, but 17 voted to keep them in it.

A previous post on the issue is available here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • LinkedIn

4 Comments »

Comment by William R. Cumming

December 1, 2011 @ 2:16 pm

So is there a SAP out of the Administration? Could that be accessed?

Comment by Alan Wolfe

December 2, 2011 @ 8:13 am

For shame. Cowards who do not trust the judicial system and who see Muslim sympathizers behind every tree. You’d think our elected officials could remember the Japanese internment camps, used in the United States not so long ago.

Pingback by Homeland Security Watch » Locking up terrorists…but not in Guantánamo

December 12, 2011 @ 2:05 pm

[...] depend on domestic prisons and existing civilian judicial instruments.  Unfortunately, that is not happening. Share and Enjoy: Tweet This Post Permalink | | Comment on this Post [...]

Pingback by Death of Osama Bin Laden - Al Qaeda founder - Abbottabad - Justice has been done - Barack Obama

December 14, 2011 @ 2:08 am

[...] 12 hours or more. NDTV 24×7, BBC, CNN, CNN-IBN and some other channels should take note of that.The news of the death of Osama Bin Laden on 2/5/2011 (1/5/2011 in USA) in Abbottabad brought cheers … Osama Bin Laden could not have remained in Pakistan without Pakistani army’s support. Many [...]

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>