Homeland Security Watch

News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security

February 27, 2012

Nuclear blast simulator: NUKEMAP

Filed under: Catastrophes,General Homeland Security,Radiological & Nuclear Threats,WMD — by Arnold Bogis on February 27, 2012

Recently the web saw the emergence of a new online nuclear detonation simulator: NUKEMAP.

Created by Alex Wellerstein, a historian of science at the American Institute of Physics and blogger at “Restricted Data The Nuclear Secrecy Blog,” this simulator is the best example of an admittedly small class of apps. It allows one to pick the target and yield of the device, either through drop down boxes or by entering unique values.  For the sake of simplicity, it defaults with an idealized air burst which eliminates the computational messiness of modeling the influence of unique geography and weather.

So this isn’t your National Lab/FEMA 3-D model tailored to individual cityscapes.  But it gives you a general idea about the varying effects of different sizes of nuclear weapons.

The features, in Alex’s own words:

  • Easily draggable target marker (which has an adorable little atom on it)!
  • Bright, stomach-churning colors indicating major negative effects of atomic detonations!
  • Effects described include zones of 500 rem exposure, major overpressures, and fire! Plus, the legend breaks these down into easy-to-understand descriptions of what they mean for your average person caught inside of them.
  • Lots of pre-sets for both places to drop them (I didn’t want to discriminate) and yields of historical weapons! It has never been easier to put a 50Mt H-bomb on the Eiffel Tower.
  • Automatically tries to drop the bomb on wherever Google thinks you are accessing the Internet from (based on your IP address)!
  • You can link to specific detonations and send them to your friends to enjoy forever!
  • Automatic zooming to make sure that all of a given nuke’s effects fit within the view window! (This can be disabled.)
  • More historically contextualized than your average web app!

While obviously trying to inject some levity in the most serious of subjects, among Alex’s stated goals for this project was to visually explain the difference between fission and fusion weapons effects:

I have in the past made maps of this sort for use in teaching, when I want to emphasize how “impressive” the first hydrogen bomb was when compared to the first atomic bombs. If you dropped a Fat Man-style bomb onto downtown Boston, the results wouldn’t be pretty, but the effects would be limited to the immediate area surrounding the peninsula, primarily. (In other words, I would tell the students, Harvard is probably not too bad off, fallout excepting, but MIT is completely fried.) Do the same thing with an Ivy Mike-sized bomb and you’ve set houses on fire all the way out to Concord (a visual argument, when done with appropriate build-up and theatricality, that never failed to result in a horrified gasp from the auditorium of undergrads). It becomes quite clear why many of the atomic scientists of the day considered H-bombs to be exclusively genocidal weapons.

For homeland security planners what this simulator makes vivid is how the threat has changed since the end of the Cold War. Multiple Soviet warheads in the hundred kiloton or megaton range is a totally different story than a single nuclear terrorist device around the size of the Hiroshima bomb or even lower.  While any local and state response will be immediately overwhelmed, the current threats are still national  catastrophes than can and should be planned for at a regional level.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • LinkedIn


Comment by William R. Cumming

February 28, 2012 @ 1:38 am

Amazing to me how few outside the nuclear priesthood understood the differences in catastrophic consequences of improvements in atomic and nuclear weapons. One reason understanding of “nuclear winter” if the Soviets and USA executed their SIOPS came as a shock.

Well both the Russians and USA still have MAD as strategic doctrine. And try reviewing the “DAY AFTER” exercise conclusions.

Because so few understood the implications of failure to control proliferation, the world could well have 30 ballistic capable, nuclear capable nation-states by 2030!

And few understand the complexities of nuclear safeguard and surety issues or the command and control problems inherent in nuclear weapons.

Interesting APP!

Comment by Frank West

March 28, 2012 @ 2:24 pm

Ive Covered Wars You Know!

Comment by hungary

August 16, 2012 @ 8:53 am

the nuclear weapon of hungary nuclear force of the bomb

Comment by homer simpson

January 14, 2013 @ 8:26 am


Comment by homer simpson

January 14, 2013 @ 8:26 am


Comment by homer simpson

January 14, 2013 @ 8:27 am

i like cathsssssssssssssssssss!:-O

Comment by your mom

January 14, 2013 @ 8:32 am

ur late for supper William R. Cumming!!!!!!!

Pingback by Homeland Security Watch » Nuclear Explosion Simulators: Check out NUKEMAP 2.0…and 3D

July 22, 2013 @ 2:30 am

[…] The first NUKEMAP, a nuclear detonation simulator, appeared in February 2012. At the time I described it: […]

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>