Homeland Security Watch

News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security

January 19, 2014

Analysis of the President’s NSA Speech

Filed under: General Homeland Security — by Arnold Bogis on January 19, 2014

While I do not have any personal insights regarding the President’s speech on NSA activities, I thought I’d share the opinions of others that might prove interesting or helpful in understanding the issues involved.

On Fox News Sunday, former NSA and CIA Director Michael Hayden gave what I thought was a concise and helpful 30,000-foot analysis of the President’s speech (though at the end of the segment on the subject of Iran he thread the needle of staying on the “right” side of Iranian hawks while not committing himself to supporting the current Senate sanctions bill, IMHO because he understands it does nothing to help the situation but doesn’t want to go on record…but that’s another topic).

 

On the afternoon of the President’s speech, several Brookings Institute experts provided their expert analysis on the various issues that are tied to the overall topic. Panelists that participated brought legal, privacy, counter-terrorism, and cyber defense points of view. [Note: Apologies for the technical difficulties, but I was unable to crop the video to start at the beginning of the panel.  So you will either have to forward the video below to the 1:10:00 mark or go here directly to the Brookings page: http://www.brookings.edu/events/2014/01/17-obama-nsa-reforms-speech-privacy-commerce-national-security]

 

On a final, somewhat worrisome, note, here is a short blog post from noted security technologist Bruce Schneier on his briefing members of Congress on NSA activities:

This morning I spent an hour in a closed room with six Members of Congress: Rep. Lofgren, Rep. Sensenbrenner, Rep. Scott, Rep. Goodlate, Rep Thompson, and Rep. Amash. No staffers, no public: just them. Lofgren asked me to brief her and a few Representatives on the NSA. She said that the NSA wasn’t forthcoming about their activities, and they wanted me — as someone with access to the Snowden documents — to explain to them what the NSA was doing.

While it’s always a good idea for members of Congress to seek expert opinion outside of government, in this case it seems that they weren’t seeking context or subject matter expertise on a particular subject but rather a description of the activities of a particular government agency.  This can’t be a good thing…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • LinkedIn

4 Comments »

Comment by William R. Cumming

January 20, 2014 @ 3:55 am

Better late than never?

Should the Senate go Republican I expect both Houses of Congress to reorganize themselves!

Comment by John Comiskey

January 20, 2014 @ 6:43 am

I understand that Congress must know a lot about a lot of issues. That is why they have access to, amongst other sources, the Congressional Research Service.

See: ADMINISTRATION WHITE PAPER
BULK COLLECTION OF TELEPHONY METADATA
UNDER SECTION 215 OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT
August 9, 2013
http://www.fas.org/irp/nsa/bulk-215.pdf

See also resources from the Federation of American Scientists
See also: http://www.fas.org/irp/nsa/

I understand that NSA cannot be fully forthcoming on all issues, i.e. there are “grey areas.” Again citing Mark Lowenthal, in government and particularly in intelligence we assent to a degree of ambiguity. See:
http://www.amazon.com/Intelligence-Secrets-Policy-Mark-Lowenthal/dp/1608716759/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1390217653&sr=8-1&keywords=Mark+Lowenthal
See also Spineless spies: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/22/AR2008052202961.html

The IC does offer intelligence estimates predicated on assumptions, estimates, and judgments. There is no crystal ball. NSA methods do, however, bring us closer to assessing our adversaries intentions and capabilities, and understanding all threats, hazards, and national vulnerabilities.

Decision makers must act on IC intelligence with the caveat that intelligence estimates are not crystal balls.

Comment by William R. Cumming

January 20, 2014 @ 9:41 am

Do you remember the Obama promised Cyber Czar? Never happened. Now events in the saddle as Snowden doc release demonstrates Chinese Water Torture technique! Drip! Drip! Drip!

Comment by William R. Cumming

January 20, 2014 @ 9:44 am

It takes a lot of money to exploit new technology!

That is why the USA both private and public sectors are the lead in proliferation of the dangerous technologies that may end civilization. From atom bombs to the cyber world the US is big happy dog sending message don’t worry be happy!

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>