Homeland Security Watch

News and analysis of critical issues in homeland security

July 9, 2014

Border Musings

Filed under: Border Security — by Arnold Bogis on July 9, 2014

A couple of random thoughts about the border.

- – - – - – - – - -

What means “secure?” A lot of criticism directed towards the President over the current crisis at the border comes back around to either he has not “secured our border” or that before money should be directed toward HHS efforts at housing and caring for the immigrant children or to bolstering the judicial process they must be go through according to a 2008 law he must first “secure our border.”  

By what measure is it not secure? Or, to put it in the context of the present crisis, what border town is overrun with these Central American children?  To listen to the media, you would think these kids are spreading out from the border like those killer bee maps that once made the rounds.  Yet it seems that these children are getting up to the border and basically turning themselves in. Instead of providing the money the Administration says is necessary to deal with this issue, some Congressmen are calling for the National Guard to be deployed.  What are they going to do?  Shoot the kids as they approach the border?  

- – - – - – - – - -

Apparently if the President doesn’t show up at some border crossing or detention center during his current trip to Texas it will be his “Katrina moment.” Politico give some context to this charge:

Earlier this week, Democratic Rep. Henry Cuellar, whose Texas district is situated along the U.S.-Mexico border, said he hoped Obama’s decision not to visit the border wouldn’t be his “Katrina moment.” The congressman was referring to then-President George W. Bush’s widely criticized response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Bush was famously photographed in the aftermath of the storm surveying the damage from above while aboard Air Force One, a photograph he called a “huge mistake” in 2010.

“In this case where there’s a crisis, a leader’s going to be defined on how he or she handles that crisis,” Cuellar said on CNN Wednesday morning. “You can send surrogates to the border, you can be 500 miles away like how he’s going to be in Dallas today, but he ought to go down there.”

I agree with the first part of that statement about crisis leadership.  I do not agree with the second.  Much sound and fury has been aired demanding that President Obama travel to “the border” (exactly where to see what is never specified).  Only if, ONLY IF he would, obviously the Administration’s entire response to this situation would change.

How?  I have no idea.  I can imagine a Presidential visit would boost the morale of the men and women working at the, uh, locations he visits.  Beyond that, it is unclear what positive impact a Presidential visit to one or two locations on a limited stretch of the border will have.  Will the amount of time he spends on the issue change?  Probably not.  Will the directions he gives his Cabinet secretaries gain added urgency?  Unlikely.  Will his critics find something new to complain about? Undoubtedly.

There is still much to learn and apply from the mistakes made in preparing for and responding to Hurricane Katrina.  Perhaps some can be applied to this situation at the border.  However, I hope people will refrain from throwing around simple comparisons for political scoring sake.  The men and women working their hardest to resolve this crises, at the border and throughout the country, deserve better than that.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Print
  • LinkedIn

2 Comments »

Comment by Philip J. Palin

July 10, 2014 @ 8:36 am

Arnold:

Apparently we have been grazing the same grass this week. This topic and the Caliphate have preoccupied me. My post conflates them. You have probably been wiser to separate.

But… off the front page I will share a growing concern: What is rational is not always reasonable. What is logical is not always persuasive. There are aspects of theater that capture reality much more fully than the very best legal brief.

(This is a response to the President’s complaint: “This is not theater.”)

There are symbols, irrational acts, and emotional gestures that can be essential to positive human engagement. Detachment has its benefits. But leadership — especially at a distance — often involves deploying the irrational in service to reason.

FDR benefited greatly from the service of Robert Sherwood the playwright and screenwriter. Sherwood was especially adept at finding phrases and images that transcended (subverted, confused, overturned)the bitter divisions of the late thirties.

There is an important place for theater, both on the border and along the Tigris. Theater is not, for long, a replacement for substance. But substance without the theater often falls flat.

Comment by Christopher Tingus

July 13, 2014 @ 10:12 am

Theatre – you betcha and this Executive WH is abusing our laws and in fact breaking them by allowing illegals to enter our border and a Mexican government allowing both its borders to be transgressed and yet our brave American soldier, now 100 days imprisoned and billions of tax dollars sent to Mexico – what a charade! Our Homeland Security has now been so compromised that We as a nation and people are gravely placed in much peril by Barry Obama who should be placed under House arrest for suspicion in breach of faith, treason along with his top cop, the illustrious AG!

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>